Teamster
President James Hoffa last week called for ownership of
America's port operations only by American companies. He
is right. But we must go beyond ports.
America is in the dangerous process of
selling off our national defense. All American military
systems are required to be built with only 50 percent of
American parts.
Recently Congress attempted to raise
that level to 65 percent, but the Bush Pentagon and
defense contractors said "no."
Preparedness suffers
Early in the Iraq war, a Swiss
subcontractor refused to continue to supply our military
with critical parts for "smart bombs" because of its
opposition to the war. The 50 percent reliability of our
military preparedness -- due to relying on foreign parts
-- is unacceptable.
Many parts to the Navy F-14 Tomcat
fighter jet are now shipped in from Poland, and the
Marines are looking to do the same thing with their
Cobra helicopter.
U.S. soldiers now carry 240G machine
guns -- made by Fabrique Nationale, a Belgian company.
These have now all but replaced the venerable
American-made M-60s that were the U.S. weapon of choice
from Vietnam to the first Gulf War, according to
military news services. Most American military personnel
carry a 9 mm pistol -- made by Beretta, an Italian
company.
Even Marine One, the large helicopter
that chauffeurs the president, is now no longer
exclusively made in the states, but now major components
of it are made in England and Italy.
Profits
over protection
Why is the profit motive greater than
the urge to protect our country? Why is the desire to
buy and sell a greater force than patriotism? It
shouldn't be.
From tanks to technology, from
uniforms to submarines, American companies should be
outfitting our military. National homeland security,
military preparedness, borders, ports and all military
support -- all of these contracts should go to American
firms with American employees. To do otherwise is
unpatriotic and dangerous.
In some foreign ports, ship chanderly
(the provision and delivery of supplies) is done by
foreign companies.
Whom do they hire? What security
actions do they perform as they put tons of equipment on
our ships (the USS Cole suddenly comes to mind).
Subcontract Coast Guard?
Would we subcontract the Coast Guard;
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms; the Drug
Enforcement Administration or our Border Patrol? I know
we could get these jobs done more cheaply by foreign
companies.
That may seem absurd, but these
outsourced contracts for important, defense sensitive
operations are only a matter of degree. Protecting
national security is difficult enough; why burden that
effort with thousands of international businesses and
contracts?
National security should also mean
secure jobs. If all defense, security and military needs
were met by American companies, not just 50 percent, we
could provide more jobs for Americans.
Higher
U.S. vehicle content
The next step is content legislation
for government and military vehicles. I find it hard to
believe and troubling that anyone would think our
government's giving our tax dollars to foreign
manufacturers and foreign workers while Americans are
out of work would be good public policy.
At the Michigan AFL-CIO, we like to
remind visitors to our building that if every American
were to switch the purchase of just $30 a year from
imported to U.S.-made apparel and home fashions, more
than 100,000 American jobs could be saved..
This Memorial Day, citizens will pass
out small American flags to our children who watch along
parade routes. Almost all of those flags will be made in
Communist China. We should be ashamed of that, because
the lesson it teach our kids is that everything in
America is for sale, and likely to be outsourced, even
our flag.
It would be better to teach our
children about the pride in our country that American
workers have as those American workers produce our
goods, protect our ports and borders and build our
military.