It's wrong that large corporations like
Wal-Mart weasel out of their duty to provide health insurance
for their employees and shift those health care costs onto
others, much like deadbeat dads or corporate polluters who
close up shop before the cleanup costs come due.
The problem is widespread. A landmark study
by the Commonwealth Fund found that among companies with 500
or more employees, more than a quarter of their workers
actually don't receive any health insurance coverage from
their employers.
Big firms lack
coverage
Who pays the price?
Of course, these workers are the main
victims. Most Americans understand that health care should be
a right -- but these workers have nothing of the sort.
Although they do the best they can to make ends meet, millions
live in fear that they or family members will get sick because
there is no way they can pay for a doctor or hospital.
A large number of those who are paid
below-poverty wages, through no fault of their own, have to
rely on Medicaid or other state programs when they become ill.
That means that if you're a taxpayer, you
pick up the tab every time a business doesn't pay its fair
share for health care and pushes its employees onto these
programs.
The tab is colossal. The Commonwealth Fund
estimates that taxpayers are paying $21 billion to cover
workers whose employers don't provide health insurance. Other
studies claim the insured pay at least one month's premium
every year to cover the costs of the uninsured.
Other companies
suffer
If you're a businessperson who does the
right thing and provides health insurance for your employees,
you pay dearly for the businesses that don't. Not only are
they tilting the competitive playing field and unethically
cutting their costs, they are undercutting you and putting you
at an unfair disadvantage. You and your employees also pay
higher health insurance premiums to cover care for their
employees.
That is because health care providers, when
they serve workers with no insurance, have to raise their fees
to cover their own shortfall. The bottom line is that you and
your employees get hit with much higher bills.
Is it unjust? Absolutely. But fortunately,
there is a sensible and fair solution.
Responsible businesspeople, union members,
community leaders and other reformers in Michigan now have a
chance to join together to support a new Fair Share Health
Care bill introduced by state Sen. Raymond Basham, D-Taylor.
It would require large employers to invest at least 8 percent
of their payroll in health care coverage for their employees.
Employers who refuse will be required to reimburse the state
for the difference.
Polls show
enormous backing
Not only does the idea make good sense, it
has enormous popular backing. In a recent Lake Research poll,
83 percent of Americans said they support requiring large,
profitable companies either to provide health insurance for
their employees or pay a percentage of their payroll into a
health care fund.
Still, it probably won't be easy to pass
this reform. When Fair Share Health Care legislation came up
in Maryland last year, Wal-Mart flew in a platoon of lobbyists
and waged a full-throttle campaign to stop the bill.
In the end, Maryland's courageous
legislators defied Wal-Mart's pressure and passed Fair Share
Health Care and even overrode Maryland's right-wing Gov. Bob
Ehrlich's veto.
Wal-Mart and its allies are poised to use
the same tactics in Michigan. Our legislators must do the
right thing, and make sure that Michigan workers and their
children have the basic health care they deserve. After all,
they were elected to represent the people of our state -- not
Wal-Mart.